From Hype to Impact: A Practical Framework to Identify and Prioritize AI Opportunities in Your Product

Introduction: From Buzzwords to Business Value

It always starts the same way.

A casual message in a team channel.
Someone drops a link to a GenAI demo.
Another chimes in: “Can we do this for support?”
A third wonders if marketing could use it to generate campaigns.
Then someone asks, half-seriously, “What if our product had a copilot too?”

Suddenly, it’s everywhere. GenAI becomes the unofficial agenda in product meetings, hackathons, even 1:1s. Everyone wants in. No one’s sure where to begin.

This isn’t just a tech trend, it’s a wave. And as a product leader, you’re expected to do something about it. But what exactly? Automate a process? Launch a new feature? Replace existing UX with AI-powered magic?

Here’s the truth: AI is not the strategy. Solving real problems is.
But figuring out where AI actually helps and what’s just shiny-object noise is the hard part.

That’s why I built a simple, repeatable framework to help product teams identify, evaluate, and prioritize GenAI use cases that drive real business value. Not just because it’s trendy, but because it’s useful, feasible, and justifiable to your exec team.

In this post, I’ll walk you through:

  • The 4-part PAVE framework to score and compare AI opportunities

  • A one-page AI Canvas to help you think through a use case from end to end

  • A simple ROI model to back up your ideas with data (because yes, your CFO will ask)

Whether you’re leading a B2B SaaS platform, a consumer app, or internal tools for your enterprise, this guide will help you cut through the noise and actually move.

Let’s dive in.

Why AI Needs a Product Mindset

Let’s get one thing out of the way: AI isn’t a magic feature. It’s a tool, one that needs a clear purpose, thoughtful design, and measurable outcomes.

Too often, teams approach AI like it’s a novelty. “Let’s sprinkle in some GPT and see what happens.” But that’s a fast way to burn time, budget, and trust especially with stakeholders watching closely.

What’s missing?
A product mindset.

The same mindset that guides every great product decision:

  • Who is this for?

  • What problem does it solve?

  • How will we know it’s working?

That’s where AI needs to live, not in the R&D corner or the lab, but in the heart of product thinking. Because the most successful AI efforts aren’t just clever, they’re useful. They drive efficiency, improve experience, unlock new capabilities, or create real value for users.

Product leaders are uniquely positioned to make that happen. You know how to balance user needs, tech feasibility, and business priorities. Now it’s time to apply that same discipline to AI.

This isn’t about building an “AI strategy.”
It’s about embedding AI into your product strategy the same way you’d think about mobile, cloud, or APIs.

And like any feature, AI should earn its place.

Common Traps to Avoid

And yet, even with the right mindset, it’s easy to fall into traps. I’ve seen well-meaning teams waste months on AI experiments that go nowhere, not because the tech didn’t work, but because the problem wasn’t worth solving, or the user never asked for it, or worse, the outcome couldn’t be measured.

If you’re just starting to explore AI use cases or trying to rescue ones that stalled, watch out for these common missteps.

1. Starting with the model, not the user
The most common mistake I see: teams begin with the tech. “We have access to GPT-4; what can we do with it?” It feels exciting, but it’s backwards. Start with a user pain. A job to be done. A workflow that’s clearly broken. Then ask: “Could AI make this meaningfully better?”

2. Building for demos, not outcomes
It’s tempting to chase that magical GenAI demo, the kind that gets applause in town halls and investor decks. But what happens after the applause? Does it get used? Does it change anything? If your success metric is “we built it,” you’re thinking like a lab. Instead, define success like a product leader: usage, adoption, efficiency, retention.

3. Ignoring the data reality
AI lives or dies by data. Some use cases seem brilliant on paper until you realize your data is messy, unstructured, or scattered across 17 tools. Before you commit, ask: Do we have the right inputs to make this work reliably?

4. Underestimating change management
AI can be intimidating. It alters workflows, raises concerns, and sometimes triggers resistance from the people it’s meant to help. Don’t assume “smart” equals “adopted.” The best GenAI features come with onboarding, context, opt-outs, and trust built in.

5. Trying to “AI all the things”
Not everything needs AI. Some use cases are better solved with filters, rules, or good UX. Over-AI-ing your product leads to bloat, confusion, and maintenance nightmares. Treat AI as a scalpel, not a sledgehammer.

The takeaway: AI success isn’t about the model. It’s about product thinking.
And that means picking the right use cases, solving the right problems, and doing it in a way that drives clear, measurable value.

So how do you figure out what’s worth doing?

Let’s find out the use cases.

Discover Use Cases

Once you avoid the common traps, the next question is: where do we start?

The good news is, you probably don’t need to look very far.

Most teams already have a dozen viable AI use cases hiding in plain sight. The key is knowing how to spot them and framing them in a way that gets buy-in from both your team and your leadership.

Here are three reliable ways I’ve seen product teams surface high-value AI opportunities:

1. Look for friction
Start with the messy stuff. The repetitive, manual, error-prone parts of your product or business. These are often great candidates for AI-driven automation or summarization. Think: support agents triaging tickets, users writing similar queries over and over, operations teams stuck in spreadsheets.

Ask your team:

“What’s something we do every day that feels dumb, repetitive, or painful?”

You’ll get gold.

2. Mine the “wish list”
Talk to your sales engineers, your support leads, your PMs. Ask them:

“What do customers keep asking for that we’ve never had the time or resources to build?”

Some of those wishlist items like personalized recommendations, natural language search, or insights from unstructured data are suddenly feasible with GenAI. What was hard or expensive two years ago may now be a weekend prototype.

3. Shadow the user
One of the most underrated discovery tactics: watch people work. Sit in on a live onboarding. Listen to support calls. Observe how users complete a task in your app. You’ll see where they hesitate, where they switch tabs, where they copy/paste. AI thrives in these gaps.

You’re not looking for “cool AI ideas.” You’re looking for real problems that AI might solve better than current solutions.

Once you’ve surfaced a few opportunities, you’ll need a way to evaluate them quickly and clearly.

That’s where the PAVE framework comes in; your go-to tool for deciding which GenAI use cases are actually worth building.

Prioritize with the P.A.V.E. Framework

Once you’ve surfaced a handful of promising AI ideas, the real work begins: figuring out which ones are actually worth building.

Not every use case is created equal. Some solve real pain. Some are better suited for classic software. Some sound exciting but deliver very little impact when they ship. Without a structured way to vet them, it’s easy to get lost or worse, to waste months on shiny demos that don’t move the needle.

That’s why I created the PAVE framework.

It’s a simple, battle-tested way to quickly evaluate GenAI use cases across four dimensions:

P — Pain
How real and acute is the problem you’re solving?
Is this a “nice to have” or a “drop everything and fix it” kind of issue?
The more painful the problem, the more likely your AI solution will drive adoption and excitement. Low-pain problems usually lead to low usage, no matter how clever the tech.

Gut check:

“Would someone actually notice if we solved this tomorrow?”

A — AI Fit
Is AI actually the right tool for this?
Some problems are perfect for GenAI: unstructured text, summarization, personalization, classification, predictions. Others are better solved with good UX, filters, or rules engines.

Gut check:

“Is there something fundamentally fuzzy, pattern-based, or language-driven about the task?”

If it’s clear-cut and deterministic, AI might overcomplicate things instead of helping.

V — Value
What’s the business impact if we get this right?
Value can show up as increased revenue, improved retention, reduced costs, faster workflows you name it. But it needs to be tangible. And how wide is the reach?  You’re not looking for abstract benefits like “better vibes.”

Gut check:

“If we solve this, how will it show up on a dashboard the CEO actually cares about?”

E — Effort
How hard will this be to build, integrate, and maintain?
Some GenAI projects sound easy (“just call an API!”) but hide brutal edge cases under the hood like hallucinations, privacy issues, ongoing model tuning. Others can be surprisingly lightweight if you scope smartly.

Gut check:

“Can we ship a first version in 4–8 weeks without needing a standing army?”

When you stack your ideas against Pain, AI Fit, Value, and Effort, patterns emerge fast.
Some ideas light up green across the board: build these first.
Others look exciting but flunk Pain or Value: rethink or park them.
Some seem promising but are massive lifts: consider breaking them down.

PAVE helps you stay disciplined. It keeps you focused on what matters: real users, real problems, real impact—not just building AI for the sake of it.

And once you’ve identified a few PAVE-approved ideas? That’s when the real fun begins: prototyping, testing, learning fast, and scaling what works.

Flesh Out the Idea with the AI Canvas

By now, you’ve surfaced your top GenAI opportunities using the PAVE framework. Now it’s time to zoom in and flesh out the details.

This is where the AI Canvas becomes your best friend.

Think of it as a practical, one-page cheat code to align your cross-functional team from product to engineering to design to execs. It brings structure to what’s often a fuzzy conversation. No more hand-wavy “let’s throw ChatGPT at it” vibes. This is about clarity.

Here’s what each box in the canvas actually means, and why it matters:

1. Problem / Opportunity (1–5)
Start here, always. What’s the real user pain, inefficiency, or business opportunity we’re going after? Get specific. If this box is vague, nothing else will save you. You’re not building with AI, you’re solving a problem using AI.

2. Target Users / Stakeholders
Who actually benefits? Internal teams? End-users? Specific roles (like underwriters, recruiters, claim adjusters)? This helps you stay focused on who the feature is for—and who’ll care enough to use it.

3. Proposed GenAI Solution
What does the AI actually do? Summarize, classify, generate, rank, recommend? Be concrete. “AI magic” doesn’t fly here. Describe the core functionality you’re imagining.

4. Desired Outcomes / Success Metrics
How will you know if this works? Think adoption, efficiency, experience. CSAT, NPS, time saved, call deflection, increased conversion whatever’s relevant. Bonus: define what “bad” or “neutral” would look like too.

5. AI Fit Assessment (1–5)
Why does this problem need AI at all? Maybe the task is unstructured, repetitive, data-heavy, or language-based. If the solution doesn’t require intelligence or interpretation, a simple rule-based system might be better. This is your litmus test.

6. Technical Feasibility
Can you even build this? What models or toolkits might you use? Does your team have the data? Is the data good enough? Data is key to any feature. The team needs to dig deeper to get a handle on the data.

7. Risks & Constraints
What could go wrong? Hallucinations? Bias? Privacy breaches? Latency? Accuracy concerns? Trust issues? GenAI brings real power but also real risk. Calling these out early shows maturity and earns trust with leadership.

8. Level of Effort (1–5)
How hard is this to implement? Estimate dev lift, integration complexity, tuning needs, and UI changes. A 1 might be a simple prompt over existing data. A 5 might mean RAG, custom UI, human-in-the-loop validation, and more.

9. Business Value (1–5)
How big is the upside if this works? Think cost savings, revenue growth, competitive advantage, or experience boost. A 5 is a clear game-changer. A 1 might just be a nice-to-have that won’t move the needle.

10. PAVE Score Summary
Bring it home. Use the PAVE framework to summarize the opportunity’s strength:

  • Pain (Is it a real, felt user pain?)

  • AI Fit (Is this a natural fit for GenAI?)

  • Value (Will it impact the business?)

  • Effort (Reversed! Lower effort is better.)

Total PAVE Score = Pain + AI Fit + Value + (6 – Effort)
You’ll never make perfect trade-offs, but this math helps you spot obvious wins and avoid shiny distractions. If a use case has a low PAVE score… shelve it and move on.

The magic of the AI Canvas isn’t just in how it helps you think, it’s in how it helps your team think together. Use it in planning meetings, roadmap reviews, AI strategy docs. Make it a living artifact.

And pro tip: The canvases get filled out in dozens, fast. The trick is to quickly zero in on the few that matter.

Here’s the AI Canvas template: Canvas link and a sample Canvas: Clinical Documentation Canvas

Estimate ROI

Now that your GenAI idea is structured and scoped, it’s time to answer the one question every exec will (rightfully) ask:

“What’s the ROI?”

Because let’s be honest, cool doesn’t equal valuable. And just because GenAI is the hottest thing in tech doesn’t mean it earns a seat at your roadmap. You need to show the math.

But the good news? You don’t need an MBA or a finance team to get directional clarity. Here’s a lightweight ROI formula I’ve used with product and engineering teams to quickly sanity-check GenAI initiatives:

ROI = (Revenue Uplift + Cost Savings + Time/Productivity Gains) – (Build + Run Costs)

That’s it.

Let’s break it down, with examples:

Revenue Uplift
Could this feature drive more revenue? Examples:

  • Increasing conversion rates through better product recommendations

  • Upselling users through personalized insights

  • Retaining customers longer with smarter support

Even a 1% lift in a high-volume flow can move real numbers.

Cost Savings
Could this reduce spending somewhere? Some ways GenAI can save you money:

  • Automating support tickets (deflecting human interactions)

  • Accelerating claims processing or document review

  • Replacing outsourced data entry or QA

This is often the most immediate win, especially for operational teams.

Time / Productivity Gains
This is the most common and hardest to quantify. Try to translate saved hours into dollars or redeployable capacity. Example:

  • GenAI writing meeting summaries = 10 hours saved per week × $100/hr × 50 weeks = $50,000/year

It’s not just about time saved, it’s about freeing up people to do higher-leverage work.

Build Costs
How much will it cost to build the MVP? Factor in:

  • Engineering/design time

  • Prompt tuning / evaluation work

  • Internal coordination costs

Run Costs
This includes things like:

  • API/model costs (OpenAI, Claude, etc.)

  • Monitoring/logging infrastructure

  • Periodic prompt tuning or re-training

  • Human-in-the-loop workflows (if any)

Multiply the per-call model cost by expected volume. It adds up quickly especially with image or multi-modal models.

Optional but Powerful: Payback Period
If you really want to impress your CFO, add this:

Payback Period = Build + Run Costs ÷ Monthly Savings or Revenue Lift

If your initiative pays for itself in under 6 months, you’re in great shape. If it takes 2 years… maybe rethink.

Start Small, Measure, and Scale

By now, you’ve got a solid GenAI use case. You’ve scoped the opportunity, modeled the ROI, and probably started sketching out the build in your head. The temptation at this point? To go big. To rally the whole team, build a robust v1, and “launch AI” at your company.

Resist that urge.

The companies doing GenAI well aren’t the ones boiling the ocean. They’re the ones that start with something narrow, useful, and measurable and use those wins to earn the right to go further.

Here’s a simple playbook I’ve seen work across teams and industries:

Start with 1–2 quick wins

Look for use cases that are low-effort, low-risk, and high-visibility. The kind of things that take a few weeks to ship but make people say, “Oh wow, this is actually useful.”

Some good candidates:

  • Auto-generating summaries of support chats

  • Categorizing user feedback or reviews

  • Writing onboarding copy with a human-in-the-loop

Don’t worry if it’s not flashy. The goal here is to show value, not wow with tech.

Pick 1 strategic bet

While quick wins buy you credibility, a bigger, more strategic use case can buy you leverage. This could be something tied to revenue growth, cost reduction, or core product differentiation but still scoped small enough to build a v1 in a few months, not quarters.

You don’t need to bet the farm. You just need to start the learning loop.

Ship, measure, learn

Set clear metrics (remember the GenAI Canvas?) and make sure you’re set up to track them. The key question to ask: Did this change behavior or outcomes in a meaningful way?

That could mean higher engagement, fewer tickets, faster workflows, or better CSAT. Don’t just look at usage, look at impact.

And share what you learn. Create a short Loom, show a before/after, or drop a one-pager in Slack. GenAI can be intimidating to non-technical teams. Your job is to make it feel real, useful, and safe.

Build trust incrementally

Trust is the real currency in any AI rollout. Trust from your team that you’re not chasing hype. Trust from leadership that this won’t blow up in their face. Trust from users that what you’re building won’t hallucinate its way into chaos.

You earn that trust by:

  • Being transparent about what the AI can and can’t do

  • Having humans in the loop early on

  • Designing for reversibility; start with opt-in, not forced automation

  • Fixing what breaks, quickly

Turn wins into momentum

Once you have a few small wins under your belt, things start to change. People start Slack DMing you with their own GenAI ideas. Execs bring it up in all-hands. Engineers start prototyping things on their own.

That’s your cue to scale. You’ve proven value, built internal momentum, and established a track record of delivering. Now, you can start thinking about deeper integrations, dedicated teams, or platform investments.

But you got there not by launching AI across the company but by shipping one helpful, boring, high-leverage thing at a time.

Conclusion: Your Role as a Product Leader

If you take just one thing away from this, let it be this:

AI isn’t a research problem anymore. It’s a product opportunity.

We’re past the phase of speculative excitement and into the phase where real companies are building real products, shipping them fast, and capturing real value. And who’s best positioned to lead that work?

You are.

Not the data scientist. Not the AI strategist. You, the product leader who knows your customers, knows your systems, and knows how to ship.

You don’t need a PhD in machine learning to start. What you need is the same muscle you’ve always used: identifying problems worth solving, testing solutions quickly, and shipping value. GenAI just adds a new set of tools to your toolbox. A powerful new set, sure. But still just tools.

The real differentiator isn’t the model you pick. It’s your judgment. Your taste. Your ability to find that small but magical use case that everyone else missed.

The companies that win in this next wave of AI won’t be the ones that threw the most money at it. They’ll be the ones where someone like you rolled up their sleeves, picked a problem that mattered, and made something useful.

So don’t wait for a mandate. Don’t wait for a tiger team or a roadmap.

Pick one use case. Fill out the canvas. Score it with PAVE. Build something small. Measure the impact. Share it with your team.

And just like that, you’re no longer watching the GenAI wave.

You’re riding it.

Getting Started with AI – A Practical Guide for Engineers Who Don’t Want to Be Left Behind

Not long ago, artificial intelligence felt like a distant frontier — the realm of research labs, academic journals, and sci-fi speculation. Today, it’s suddenly everywhere: powering customer service bots, writing code, summarizing meetings, and reshaping entire industries in its wake. For engineers watching from the sidelines, the shift can feel less like a gradual evolution and more like a tidal wave.

Over the past week, I spoke with few mentees navigating a career transition and chatted with a few engineers at a community. All of them voiced a version of the same question: Where do I start? What should I learn? What’s the right approach — not in theory, but in practice? These weren’t AI researchers or startup founders — just thoughtful, capable engineers trying to make sense of a fast-moving landscape and what it means for their careers.

The truth is, you don’t need to be a machine learning expert to get started with AI. You don’t need a Ph.D., a new title, or even a major shift in direction. What you need is a way in — a path that’s focused, practical, and grounded in what engineers do best: learning by building.

This guide is for those engineers — not to hype the technology, but to help demystify it. To offer a place to begin. And, maybe, a bit of reassurance that it’s not too late to dive in.

Why Engineers Feel Stuck

There’s no shortage of excitement around AI — or anxiety. The internet is flooded with tutorials, model announcements, and think pieces. Social feeds are a blur of demos and side projects, each one more impressive than the last. And while that energy can be inspiring, it can also have a paralyzing effect.

Many engineers I’ve spoken with — smart, experienced builders — describe the same feeling: overwhelm. Not because they doubt their abilities, but because the signal is hard to find in all the noise. Should they dive into Python notebooks and train models from scratch? Learn the internals of transformer architectures? Or start wiring up APIs from tools like OpenAI, Anthropic, or Hugging Face?

There’s also a deeper tension beneath the surface: the fear that what made you good at your job — years of honing systems thinking, mastering frameworks, scaling infrastructure — might not translate cleanly into this new era. It’s not that AI is replacing engineers. But it is changing the kinds of problems we solve and how we solve them. And that shift can feel disorienting.

Add to that the pressure of keeping up with peers who seem to be “ahead” — already building LLM agents, tinkering with embeddings, or spinning up weekend projects — and it’s easy to feel stuck before you’ve even begun.

But here’s the thing: this isn’t about catching up to some mythical curve. It’s about choosing a point of entry that makes sense for you. One that aligns with your strengths, your interests, and the kinds of problems you already care about solving.

What You Don’t Need to Do

Before we talk about where to start, let’s clear up a few things. There’s a kind of mythology that’s grown around AI — that to work with it, you need to become a machine learning expert overnight. That you need to read dense research papers, train massive models from scratch, or spend nights fine-tuning weights and hyperparameters just to stay relevant.

You don’t.

You don’t need to master linear algebra or neural net theory unless you genuinely want to go deep. You don’t need to compete with researchers at OpenAI. And you certainly don’t need to build the next ChatGPT to be part of this shift.

If anything, chasing the most complex or cutting-edge thing can actually slow you down. It can trap you in tutorials or deep dives that never quite lead to something you can use. That’s the paradox: in a field that’s evolving so quickly, it’s easy to mistake depth for progress.

The truth is, most of the real value — especially for engineers working in product teams, enterprise systems, or internal tools — comes from learning how to use these models, not build them from scratch. It’s the same way we use databases, APIs, or cloud services: we understand the principles, but we spend most of our time solving business problems, not writing query planners or compilers.

So take the pressure off. You don’t need to reinvent yourself. You need to reorient — to shift your mindset from “I need to know everything” to “I want to build something.”

What You Do Need to Know (Core Concepts)

If you strip away the buzzwords and the branding, most modern AI — especially what you see in products today — boils down to a few core ideas. You don’t need to master them, but you should know what they mean, what they’re good for, and where their limits are.

Start with Large Language Models (LLMs). These are the engines behind tools like ChatGPT, Claude, and GitHub Copilot. What matters isn’t how they’re trained, but that they’re remarkably good at language-based tasks — summarizing text, drafting emails, writing code, translating, and even reasoning through problems (within limits). They’re not “smart” in the human sense, but they’re fluent — and that fluency opens a world of possibilities.

Next, get familiar with embeddings. Think of them as a way to turn words, documents, or even users into vectors — mathematical representations that capture meaning or context. They’re behind everything from semantic search to recommendations to matching candidates to jobs. If you’ve used a feature that says, “show me more like this,” embeddings were probably at work.

Then there’s retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) — a mouthful that describes a powerful pattern: combining a language model with your own data. Instead of trying to cram everything into the model, you let it pull in relevant context from documents, databases, or APIs before answering. It’s what powers many enterprise AI apps today — and it’s something you can build with a few tools and a weekend.

Finally, understand prompting and APIs. Most of your early work with AI will come from interacting with models via simple, well-documented APIs. You’ll spend more time writing smart prompts and shaping outputs than doing anything “hardcore.” That’s a feature, not a bug — it means you can move fast.

You don’t need to know everything. But if you learn to think in these building blocks — models, embeddings, context, prompts — you’ll be dangerous in all the right ways.

A 30-Day Learning Plan

This isn’t a bootcamp. It’s a runway — designed to help you go from zero to hands-on, with just a few focused hours a week. It won’t make you an AI expert, but it’ll make you useful. And in a world moving this fast, that’s the difference between catching the wave or missing it entirely.

Week 1: Orientation and Vocabulary

Don’t start by coding. Start by understanding. Read the docs for OpenAI’s API. Watch a couple of talks from the OpenAI Dev Day or Hugging Face YouTube channel. Learn the basic building blocks: LLMs, tokens, embeddings, prompting, fine-tuning vs. retrieval. No pressure to memorize — just get familiar with the terrain.

Week 2: Make Something Useless

Yes, useless. Build something just for fun — a chatbot that speaks like a pirate, a bedtime story generator, a sarcastic email summarizer. Use GPT-4 or Claude and host it in a Jupyter notebook or basic React page. The point isn’t the output. It’s to learn how to call the model, structure prompts, and debug the quirks.

Week 3: Make Something Useful

Now, apply the same tools to a real annoyance in your life or work. Summarize Slack threads. Auto-tag emails. Clean messy data. Use LangChain or LlamaIndex if needed. Start pulling in outside data. Get a feel for what’s easy, what breaks, and what needs human oversight.

Week 4: Share, Reflect, Repeat

Document what you built. Share a demo or blog post. Read what others are building. Compare notes. What worked? What didn’t? Where did you hit walls? This reflection is where learning compounds. You’ll start to build an intuition — and that’s what separates a curious dev from someone who can actually ship.

You’re not trying to master AI in 30 days. You’re trying to start a habit. Learn a little. Build a little. Share a little. Then repeat.

That’s how you catch up. And that’s how you stay ahead.

Don’t Do It Alone

One of the biggest myths about getting into AI is that it’s a solo sport — just you, some Python scripts, and a stack of blog posts. The truth? The people who are making the most progress aren’t doing it alone. They’re part of a community, even if that community is just a few friends on Discord or a Slack channel at work.

This space is moving fast. Faster than most of us can keep up with. New models drop every few weeks. Libraries change overnight. What worked yesterday might break tomorrow. And no one — no matter how many years they’ve been coding — has all the answers. So stop pretending you should.

Instead, find your people.

Maybe it’s a coworker who’s curious too. Maybe it’s a local meetup. Maybe it’s a low-key AI Discord where folks share what they’re building and what broke. Join open-source communities. Comment on GitHub issues. Ask questions, even the ones that feel dumb. Especially the ones that feel dumb.

And if you don’t see the kind of community you want? Start one. Post a message. Organize a Friday “build-with-AI” hour. Invite people who are just figuring it out like you. You don’t need to be an expert — you just need to show up.

Because staying relevant in tech has always been about more than just knowing the latest tool. It’s about having people to learn with, debug with, and get inspired by.

Don’t try to do this alone. You don’t have to.

Final Thoughts: It’s a Craft, Not a Title

There’s a lot of noise out there — titles like “AI Engineer,” “Prompt Engineer,” “ML Specialist.” But here’s the truth: no one’s waiting to hand you a badge. And most of the people doing the best AI work didn’t start with a title. They started with curiosity.

AI isn’t something you learn once and master. It’s not a certification to post on LinkedIn. It’s a craft. One that rewards tinkering, learning out loud, and staying uncomfortable — even when you have years of experience under your belt.

It’s also not a zero-sum game. You don’t need to know everything to contribute. You just need to know a little more than yesterday — and be willing to share what you’ve learned with others. That’s how movements start. That’s how momentum builds.

So if you’ve been watching from the sidelines, wondering if it’s too late or too complicated — stop. The best engineers I know aren’t waiting to be taught. They’re teaching themselves, together.

And you can, too.

Resources: Learn Smarter, Not Just Harder

You don’t need a fancy degree or a new job title to start working with AI. But you do need the right materials — ones that respect your time and help you build real intuition. Here are some free (or mostly free) resources to get started:

Foundational Courses

GitHub Repos:

People Worth Following

  • Jeremy Howard (@jeremyphoward) – Co-founder of Fast.ai. Sharp insights, deeply human-centered. His work has helped thousands break into AI without formal academic backgrounds.
  • Andrej Karpathy (@karpathy) – Former Tesla/DeepMind/OpenAI. Shares hands-on walkthroughs, code, and big-picture thinking on LLMs and AGI.
  • Rachel Thomas (@math_rachel) – Co-founder of Fast.ai. A strong voice for accessible, ethical AI and practical education.
  • Chip Huyen (@chipro) – Focuses on real-world ML systems, LLMOps, and deploying ML at scale. Blends research and product thinking seamlessly.
  • Hamel Husain (@HamelHusain) – Former GitHub/Netflix. Known for building with LLMs and open-source contributions that are deeply practical.
  • Aishwarya Naresh Reganti – Applied Science Tech Lead at AWS and startup mentor. Bridges deep technical rigor with a passion for mentoring early-stage founders and applied innovation.
  • Aishwarya Srinivasan (@Aishwarya_Sri0) – Head of Developer Relations at Fireworks AI. Makes cutting-edge AI approachable through community engagement, demos, and developer education.
  • Rakesh Gohel (@rakeshgohel01) – Founder at JUTEQ. Building at the intersection of AI and real-world products, with a founder’s lens on how to ship fast and smart.
  • Adam Silverman (@AtomSilverman) – Co-founder and COO at Agency. At the forefront of bringing AI into creative and operational workflows, with lessons from both the startup and enterprise trenches.

AI for CEOs: How to Start, Where to Focus, and What Actually Matters

AI isn’t just another tech trend — it’s a strategic imperative.

The CEOs I’ve spoken with recently are still at the beginning of their AI journey. They’re not yet asking, “How do I use AI to grow revenue or reduce cost?” They’re asking, “What should I even be doing here?” And that’s completely fair — the landscape is noisy, the tools are evolving fast, and the stakes feel high.

But it’s the next set of questions that will define market leaders:
Where can AI create real business leverage? What problems are we uniquely positioned to solve better or faster with AI? How do we move with clarity instead of chasing hype?

In my work leading AI strategy and product across companies in InsureTech, HRTech, and enterprise SaaS, I’ve helped leadership teams move past the noise and focus on what matters: creating measurable value through practical AI adoption.

This guide is for CEOs who want to lead from the front — not by becoming AI experts, but by asking the right questions, choosing the right bets, and building an organization ready to win in the age of AI.

What Most CEOs Really Want from AI

Most of the CEOs I’ve spoken with aren’t chasing the next viral AI tool. They’re not trying to build their own ChatGPT or spin up an in-house research lab. What they really want is clarity.

They want to understand how AI can help them:

  • Serve customers better

  • Improve operational efficiency

  • Stay competitive — without chasing hype or burning out the team

There’s often a healthy skepticism in the room. They’ve seen the flashy demos. They’ve heard the big promises. But what they’re looking for is something more grounded:
Can AI actually move the needle on growth, margins, or retention — in our business, with our team, and within our constraints?

That’s the right question to ask.

Because while AI is powerful, it’s not magic. The companies that benefit most aren’t the ones who throw money at the trend — they’re the ones who identify a few high-leverage areas, run focused experiments, and build from there.

You don’t need a massive budget to get started. You need a clear problem to solve, a thoughtful way to test it, and a willingness to learn fast.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Over the past year, I’ve seen a lot of smart companies stumble with AI. Not because they lacked ambition — but because they either overcomplicated it or missed the point. Here are a few patterns I’d steer any leadership team away from:

1. Chasing shiny demos instead of solving real problems

It’s easy to get caught up in what AI can do and forget to ask what your business needs. I’ve seen teams pour months into building flashy copilots that looked impressive, but didn’t move any metrics. If you can’t tie an AI project to a specific KPI — revenue lift, cost savings, margin improvement — it’s probably not worth doing.

2. Starting with the tech, not the outcome

Too many teams begin with “Let’s use ChatGPT” instead of “Let’s prioritize leads.” The tech should serve the goal — not the other way around. I’ve had the most success when we picked a pain point, then figured out whether AI could solve it better, faster, or cheaper than our current approach.

3. Thinking this is an IT or data science problem

It’s not. This is a cross-functional opportunity. Your product, operations, customer success, finance — all of them can benefit from AI. If you leave it entirely to your data team, you’ll get technically sound experiments that don’t land with the business.

4. Waiting for perfect data

Yes, your data matters. But if you wait for it to be clean, centralized, and labeled, you’ll be waiting a long time. The beauty of modern AI — especially large language models — is that you can often do something useful even with messy, unstructured inputs. Start where you are.

5. Treating AI as a one-and-done initiative

AI isn’t a project with a start and end date. It’s a capability you build over time. The teams that win treat it like a product function — small experiments, fast feedback loops, continuous improvement. It’s not about hitting a home run right away. It’s about learning quickly and scaling what works.

A Simple Framework to Get Started (Without Burning Millions)

You don’t need a moonshot. You need momentum.

Here’s the approach I’ve seen work — not just in theory, but in the trenches across companies. It’s a simple three-phase playbook to get going without getting lost.

Phase 1: Identify High-Impact, Low-Risk Use Cases

Start small, but strategic. Look for internal bottlenecks where AI can create immediate leverage — things like:

  • Automating email summaries or internal documentation

  • Drafting responses in customer support or sales

  • Prioritizing leads with existing data

These aren’t headline-grabbers, but they save time and free up your team for higher-value work. Most importantly, they build trust. Early wins matter.

What you need:
A cross-functional team — product, ops, a couple engineers — and a clear KPI to track impact. Not perfection, just momentum.

Phase 2: Prove Value in One or Two Customer-Facing Areas

Once your team sees what’s possible, shift focus outward. Where can AI help your customers? Maybe it’s smarter onboarding, self-service support, or tailored recommendations.

These use cases start to move the needle on NPS, retention, and revenue. They also begin to differentiate your product or service — this is where AI stops being a cost-saver and starts becoming a growth lever.

What you need:
Someone who deeply understands your customer journey, a lightweight experiment (no massive rebuilds), and a tight feedback loop.

Phase 3: Make AI Part of Your Company’s DNA

This is the longer game. You’re building internal capability — not just in engineering, but across your org. That means:

  • Training teams to use AI tools responsibly

  • Hiring or upskilling product managers and operators who can spot opportunities

  • Putting in place light governance to avoid risk without slowing things down

AI should become like design thinking or agile — something baked into how you build, not a special project.

What you need:
Executive alignment, a few internal champions, and enough success stories to get buy-in across the org.

The CEO’s Role in AI Adoption

If there’s one thing I’ve learned: AI adoption doesn’t succeed because the tech is good. It succeeds because the CEO makes it a priority.

You don’t need to write Python or know how transformers work. But you do need to set the tone — and that starts with asking the right questions in the boardroom and with your exec team:

  • Where can we apply AI to move the needle on revenue or cost?

  • What problems are we uniquely positioned to solve faster or better with AI?

  • Are we empowering the right teams to run quick, scrappy experiments?

The companies that win with AI aren’t the ones with the biggest models — they’re the ones with the clearest conviction and the sharpest focus.

As CEO, your job is to:

  1. Frame AI as a business capability, not a tech initiative.
    Just like mobile or cloud before it, AI is infrastructure for the next decade. Make it part of your product and operations conversations — not just IT.

  2. Push for measurable value early.
    You don’t need a “Chief AI Officer” to get started. You need cross-functional teams, a few focused pilots, and a clear expectation: this should either grow revenue, reduce cost, or improve experience — or we’re not doing it.

  3. Model curiosity, not fear.
    Your team takes their cues from you. If you treat AI as a risk to manage or a buzzword to ignore, they will too. If you ask smart questions, stay open to learning, and reward initiative, you’ll create the right kind of momentum.

  4. Invest for the long-term — with eyes wide open.
    AI is not magic. It’s messy, it’s evolving fast, and it doesn’t replace critical thinking. But the companies that develop the muscle now will outpace those that wait for “perfect timing.”

You don’t have to bet the company on AI.
But you do have to bet on your team’s ability to learn fast, adapt, and lead — just like you always have.

That’s your edge.

Final Thoughts: It’s a Journey, Not a Magic Bullet

There’s no AI “silver bullet.” No tool that instantly transforms your company. But there is a path — and it starts with small, smart steps that build momentum.

The most successful CEOs I’ve seen treat AI like any other strategic initiative:

  • They look for leverage, not hype.

  • They back teams that move fast and learn.

  • And they don’t wait around for a playbook — they write their own.

If you’re feeling behind, don’t worry — most companies are still early in the game. But this is one of those shifts where being early and deliberate can create real compounding advantage. Not just in tech, but in talent, culture, and customer experience.

I’m convinced:
The CEOs who lean in now — thoughtfully, without panic — will be the ones shaping the next generation of category leaders.

And if you’re a CEO ready to start that journey? You don’t need to go it alone. But you do need to start.

Driving Growth in High-Growth Technology Companies: Balancing Innovation and Execution

In high-growth technology companies, the challenge isn’t just about scaling rapidly — it’s about scaling intelligently. Growth is exhilarating, but it demands a careful balance between driving innovation and ensuring disciplined execution. This balance is essential to sustaining momentum, achieving strategic goals, and creating long-term value.

 

As a leader currently navigating this balance at ReFocus AI, where we aim to lead in insurance retention management, I’ve experienced how unchecked innovation can lead to chaos while overly rigid execution can stifle creativity. The key is cultivating an environment where innovation thrives within a framework that aligns with business objectives. When creativity and accountability coexist, organizations can make bold moves without losing sight of their strategic goals.

 

Balancing vision with accountability is critical for leaders. On one hand, we need to inspire teams to think beyond boundaries and challenge the status quo. On the other, we must hold ourselves and our teams accountable for delivering results. Striking this balance means providing a clear vision while allowing teams the freedom to experiment, learn, and adapt. It’s not always easy, but it’s necessary to drive sustainable growth.

 

Innovation cannot exist in a vacuum. At SuccessFactors, we avoided the trap of treating innovation as a separate initiative by integrating it into core business processes. Innovation squads explored new ideas, but their efforts were anchored in KPIs and business goals. Creativity for its own sake can be chaotic; creativity with purpose drives results.

 

Maintaining agility as a company scales is another challenge. Growth often brings complexity, and complexity can breed bureaucracy. Embedding agile principles, encouraging cross-functional collaboration, and embracing rapid feedback cycles helped us adapt quickly while maintaining strategic focus. Agility isn’t just a methodology — it’s a mindset that empowers teams to move quickly without losing sight of the bigger picture.

 

I’ve also found that data-driven decision-making is crucial. Relying solely on intuition can lead to risky bets, while becoming overly data-dependent can paralyze decision-making. At AtlasHXM, we leveraged data to identify growth opportunities and mitigate risks, allowing us to innovate thoughtfully without being reckless.

 

One of the hardest parts of leading in a high-growth environment is resisting the urge to chase every shiny opportunity. Leaders often face pressure to prioritize quick wins, but a short-term mindset can undermine long-term success. Setting a clear North Star, aligning teams around it, and creating space for thoughtful experimentation have been vital in navigating this challenge.

 

Effective scaling also requires thoughtful investment in people. High-growth companies often focus intensely on hiring, but retention and development are equally important. Investing in training, fostering a culture of continuous learning, and creating clear career pathways help keep teams engaged and aligned with the company’s mission. At ReFocus AI, we’ve begun focusing on equipping our team not just with technical skills, but with a deeper understanding of the insurance industry. This cross-disciplinary knowledge helps bridge the gap between innovation and practical execution.

 

A key part of scaling intelligently is knowing when to pivot and when to persevere. There will be moments when strategies don’t yield the expected results, and tough decisions need to be made. The ability to assess whether a setback is a sign to adjust the approach or a signal to double down separates reactive organizations from strategic ones. For instance, when we faced challenges in aligning our AI-driven solutions with industry expectations, we took a step back, engaged with customers more deeply, and refined our approach. It wasn’t about abandoning innovation — it was about realigning it with market realities.

 

Customer-centricity is another cornerstone of sustainable growth. Scaling isn’t just about acquiring more customers; it’s about creating genuine value for them. High-growth companies often risk becoming product-centric, focusing too much on features and not enough on the problems they’re solving. At ReFocus AI, we’re constantly reminding ourselves to stay close to our customers, listen to their pain points, and evolve our solutions accordingly. In the end, the value we create for customers directly fuels our growth.

 

Ultimately, leading growth in high-growth technology companies is less about choosing between innovation and execution and more about integrating the two. The most successful organizations don’t just scale — they scale intelligently, balancing ambition with accountability, creativity with discipline. At ReFocus AI, this balance is central to how we work toward becoming a leader in the insurance retention space. It’s not a perfect science, but it’s a pursuit worth committing to.

 

Understanding DeepSeek-R1: A Game-Changer for Reasoning in AI

The AI landscape continues to evolve at an unprecedented pace, and one of the latest models garnering attention is DeepSeek-R1, a reasoning-focused large language model (LLM) developed by the Chinese AI company DeepSeek. Designed with precision for reasoning tasks, this model represents a significant leap forward in AI’s ability to handle complex logical and mathematical challenges.

In this blog, we’ll explore the company behind DeepSeek-R1, the capabilities and applications of the model, and how it stacks up against other industry-leading AI models.

About DeepSeek

DeepSeek has emerged as a significant player in the AI space, particularly due to its commitment to open-source innovation and accessibility. Here are some highlights about the company:

  • Focus Areas:
    DeepSeek specializes in building AI models with cutting-edge capabilities in areas like coding, mathematics, and reasoning. Their portfolio includes tools designed for developers, researchers, and enterprises looking to integrate AI into their workflows.
  • Commitment to Open Source:
    Unlike many proprietary AI companies, DeepSeek releases many of its models as open-source. This approach democratizes access to advanced AI, enabling researchers and developers worldwide to experiment, adapt, and innovate using their technology.
  • Flagship Models:
    DeepSeek has introduced several impactful models:

    • DeepSeek-V2: A general-purpose LLM excelling across diverse tasks.
    • DeepSeek-Coder: Tailored for coding-related applications such as code generation, debugging, and optimization.
    • DeepSeek-R1: A specialized model for reasoning tasks requiring advanced logic and mathematical problem-solving.
  • Key Features Across Models:
    • High Performance: Frequently topping AI leaderboards with its models.
    • Cost-Effective Solutions: Offers competitive pricing for API usage to make advanced AI more accessible.
    • Versatility: Models can handle a range of tasks, from reasoning and coding to text generation.
    • Seamless Integration: Designed for easy compatibility with widely used APIs, such as OpenAI’s.

In short, DeepSeek is breaking barriers in AI by combining innovation with accessibility.

DeepSeek-R1: What It Is

DeepSeek-R1 is a state-of-the-art large language model (LLM) designed with a singular focus: reasoning. It sets itself apart with its unique ability to handle logical inference, mathematical challenges, and common-sense reasoning.

Standout Capabilities of DeepSeek-R1:

  1. Mathematical Problem-Solving:
    R1 excels in solving problems ranging from elementary arithmetic to advanced calculus, abstract algebra, and theorem proving.
  2. Logical Inference:
    The model can deduce conclusions from provided premises and analyze logical relationships between data points.
  3. Common-Sense Reasoning:
    By leveraging everyday knowledge and context, R1 can reason through real-world scenarios effectively.
  4. Creative Text Generation:
    While its primary focus is reasoning, DeepSeek-R1 can also generate coherent and contextually relevant text, adding versatility to its use cases.

What It Can Do

DeepSeek-R1’s capabilities extend across industries and domains, offering solutions for a range of complex problems:

  1. Academic Research:
    From assisting with mathematical proofs to conducting data analysis, R1 is a valuable tool for researchers in STEM fields.
  2. Software Development:
    Developers can rely on R1 for debugging, logical error detection, and suggesting optimized algorithms.
  3. Financial Analysis:
    The model can forecast trends, analyze financial risks, and evaluate market data to inform decision-making.
  4. Legal Analysis:
    Lawyers can leverage R1 to analyze case documents, identify legal precedents, and construct logical arguments.
  5. Education:
    By tailoring explanations and challenges to individual students, R1 can enhance personalized learning experiences.

How to Access and Use DeepSeek-R1

There are multiple ways to integrate DeepSeek-R1 into workflows:

  • Direct API Access:
    Developers can interact with R1 via its API for seamless incorporation into applications and tools.
  • Open-Source Availability:
    R1’s open-source nature allows researchers and companies to fine-tune and customize the model to suit specific needs.
  • Third-Party Integrations:
    Expect R1 to be integrated into other platforms, expanding its usability across diverse tools and industries.

How Does DeepSeek-R1 Compare to Competitors?

1. DeepSeek-R1

  • Specialization:
    Specifically designed for reasoning tasks, DeepSeek-R1 excels in logical inference, mathematical problem-solving, and common-sense reasoning.
  • Open-Source:
    Available as open-source, enabling customization, research, and cost-effective use.
  • Strengths:
    • Superior performance in reasoning-focused tasks.
    • Versatility across applications like academic research, coding, and financial analysis.
    • Cost-effective due to open-source nature.
  • Limitations:
    • Less generalized compared to broader LLMs like Llama 2 or Falcon.
    • Smaller ecosystem compared to established models like OpenAI’s series.

2. OpenAI’s o1 Series

  • Specialization:
    Known for state-of-the-art reasoning and general-purpose tasks. Often benchmarks for reasoning and language understanding.
  • Proprietary:
    Closed-source, offering API access only, which limits customization and increases costs.
  • Strengths:
    • Top-tier performance in reasoning and general NLP tasks.
    • Backed by OpenAI’s robust research and engineering expertise.
    • Large ecosystem with seamless integration into other OpenAI tools (e.g., ChatGPT API).
  • Limitations:
    • High API costs for enterprises.
    • No open-source availability, limiting community-driven innovation.

3. Llama 2 (Meta)

  • Specialization:
    A general-purpose large language model with impressive language understanding and generation capabilities.
  • Open-Source:
    Open-source model with community-driven development and usage flexibility.
  • Strengths:
    • Strong general-purpose LLM with competitive performance in reasoning and coding tasks.
    • Large-scale community adoption and support.
    • Versatile for a wide range of applications beyond reasoning.
  • Limitations:
    • Not optimized for reasoning tasks like DeepSeek-R1.
    • Requires fine-tuning for specialized use cases.

4. Falcon

  • Specialization:
    A high-performing open-source model suitable for general NLP tasks, with emerging capabilities in reasoning.
  • Open-Source:
    Fully open-source, with an emphasis on accessibility and versatility.
  • Strengths:
    • Strong community adoption.
    • Competitive in general NLP tasks and some reasoning use cases.
    • Cost-effective for enterprises and researchers.
  • Limitations:
    • Performance in reasoning tasks not as specialized as DeepSeek-R1 or OpenAI’s o1 series.
    • Ecosystem and documentation are still maturing compared to competitors like OpenAI.

Key Differentiators

Feature DeepSeek-R1 OpenAI o1 Series Llama 2 (Meta) Falcon
Specialization Reasoning General-purpose + Reasoning General-purpose General-purpose
Open-Source Yes No Yes Yes
Reasoning Focus Highly optimized Strong Moderate Moderate
Cost-Effectiveness High (free or low-cost) Low (high API costs) High High
Customizability Fully customizable Limited (closed-source) Fully customizable Fully customizable
Ecosystem Support Growing Extensive Large Moderate

Key Advantages of DeepSeek-R1:

  • Specialization:
    Its emphasis on reasoning makes it more effective for logical tasks compared to general-purpose models.
  • Open-Source Edge:
    The open-source availability of R1 fosters innovation and reduces costs for users.
  • Cost-Effectiveness:
    Organizations can leverage R1’s capabilities without incurring high API fees, unlike proprietary solutions.

Why DeepSeek-R1 Matters

DeepSeek-R1 exemplifies the growing trend of specialized LLMs tailored to specific domains, rather than a one-size-fits-all approach. Its focus on reasoning aligns with the increasing need for models capable of handling logical and mathematical challenges, which are critical in research, education, and industries like finance and legal services.

Summary

DeepSeek-R1, developed by the innovative Chinese AI company DeepSeek, is a reasoning-focused LLM with unmatched capabilities in logic and mathematics. It offers cost-effective, open-source solutions for a wide range of applications, from academic research to software development and legal analysis.

With its specialization in reasoning, DeepSeek-R1 sets a new benchmark for LLMs and represents a step forward in democratizing access to advanced AI. Whether you’re a CTO exploring AI integration, a researcher seeking computational assistance, or a developer looking for logical insights, DeepSeek-R1 is a model worth considering.

Unlocking the Power of Machine Learning in Insurance: A CTO’s Perspective

Machine Learning (ML) is no longer just a buzzword; it’s the engine driving innovation across industries. For insurance, ML has become indispensable in areas such as fraud detection, risk assessment, dynamic pricing, and customer retention. As a CTO, understanding the landscape of ML algorithms and their applications in the insurance industry is critical—not just to deliver value but to position your company as a market leader.

In this blog, I’ll walk you through ML algorithm categories, their technical foundations, and how they solve real-world insurance problems, while offering deeper insights into implementation challenges and advanced techniques.

Understanding the Landscape of ML Algorithms

At a high level, ML algorithms can be categorized into four primary types based on how they learn from data and solve problems:

  1. Supervised Learning
  2. Unsupervised Learning
  3. Semi-Supervised Learning
  4. Reinforcement Learning

Each of these categories is uniquely suited to specific use cases in insurance. Let’s explore them.

1. Supervised Learning: Predicting the Known

Supervised learning involves training models on labeled data—datasets where both the input (features) and the desired output (labels) are known. The model learns to map inputs to outputs and generalize for unseen data.

Key Algorithms:

  • Linear Regression: Predicts continuous outcomes by minimizing errors.
    • Example: Predicting claim amounts based on factors like customer age, vehicle type, and driving history.
  • Logistic Regression: Classifies data points into discrete categories using probabilities.
    • Example: Identifying fraudulent claims.
  • Advanced Models: Random Forests, Gradient Boosted Trees, and Neural Networks refine predictions by learning complex relationships in data.

Applications in Insurance:

  • Risk Assessment: Models like Gradient Boosted Trees analyze customer data to assign risk scores.
  • Fraud Detection: Neural Networks and Random Forests detect anomalies in claim submissions.
  • Dynamic Pricing: Supervised models customize premiums based on customer risk profiles.

Supervised learning’s ability to deliver highly accurate and interpretable models makes it a cornerstone of insurance analytics. By providing clear predictions, these models empower insurers to make informed, data-driven decisions.

2. Unsupervised Learning: Discovering the Unknown

Unsupervised learning works with unlabeled data to uncover hidden patterns or structures.

Key Algorithms:

  • Clustering (K-Means, DBSCAN): Groups similar data points together.
    • Example: Segmenting customers based on demographics and behavior for targeted marketing.
  • Dimensionality Reduction (PCA, t-SNE): Simplifies data by retaining the most critical features.
    • Example: Reducing feature complexity in customer segmentation models.

Applications in Insurance:

  • Customer Segmentation: Group policyholders into clusters for personalized offers.
  • Fraud Detection: Detect patterns in claims data that indicate potential fraud.
  • Portfolio Optimization: Diversify risk by clustering policies with similar attributes.

Unsupervised learning allows insurers to uncover insights that aren’t immediately obvious. By identifying patterns in customer behavior or claims data, insurers can improve operational efficiency and develop highly targeted strategies.

3. Semi-Supervised Learning: The Best of Both Worlds

In scenarios where labeled data is scarce and expensive to obtain—common in insurance—semi-supervised learning shines. It uses a small labeled dataset alongside a large pool of unlabeled data.

Key Algorithms:

  • Self-Training: Uses model predictions on unlabeled data to iteratively improve performance.
  • Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs): Create synthetic data to augment training.

Applications in Insurance:

  • Rare Event Prediction: Identifying catastrophic claims with limited labeled data.
  • Policy Recommendations: Suggesting the most suitable policies to customers based on partial behavioral data.

Semi-supervised learning bridges the gap between supervised and unsupervised methods, making it invaluable for problems where labeled data is a limiting factor. Its ability to handle sparse data makes it highly relevant in the insurance industry.

4. Reinforcement Learning: Learning to Act

Reinforcement learning (RL) trains models to make sequential decisions in dynamic environments by rewarding desirable outcomes.

Key Algorithms:

  • Q-Learning, Deep Q-Networks (DQN): Optimize decision-making processes.
    • Example: Automating claims approvals or escalations.

Applications in Insurance:

  • Dynamic Pricing: Adjusting premiums in real-time based on customer risk and behavior.
  • Claims Automation: Streamlining claims workflows to reduce settlement times.

Reinforcement learning’s focus on decision-making and optimization makes it ideal for dynamic processes like pricing and claims management. Its ability to adapt in real time provides insurers with a competitive edge.

Technical Deep Dive: Elevating Your Expertise

Understanding the algorithms is just the beginning. To truly excel as a CTO, you need to address the real-world challenges of applying ML in insurance.

Feature Engineering: The Foundation of Accurate Models

Insurance datasets often require domain-specific feature engineering:

  • Combine historical claims and policy data to create derived features like “claims frequency” or “policy tenure-risk ratio.”
  • Use techniques like LASSO Regularization or Recursive Feature Elimination to identify the most impactful features.
  • Normalize features using Z-scores to prepare data for algorithms sensitive to magnitudes (e.g., SVM).

Feature engineering is an iterative process that requires close collaboration between data scientists, domain experts, and actuaries. For example, transforming raw policyholder data into actionable features such as “average claim amount” or “tenure-adjusted risk score” can dramatically improve model accuracy and relevance.

Handling Imbalanced Data

Insurance data often has imbalanced classes, such as a small proportion of fraudulent claims. Address this with:

  • Oversampling Techniques: SMOTE or ADASYN generate synthetic samples for the minority class.
  • Algorithm Tweaks: Incorporate class weights in Random Forests or Logistic Regression.
  • Metrics for Evaluation: Use precision, recall, and F1-Score instead of accuracy to evaluate model performance.

Handling imbalanced datasets is critical in scenarios like fraud detection, where false negatives (missed fraud) can be costly. Tools like SMOTE create realistic synthetic examples of minority cases, allowing models to learn more effectively without overfitting.

Interpretability and Regulatory Compliance

Given the regulated nature of insurance, model explainability is critical.

  • Tools like SHAP and LIME: Explain complex models like Gradient Boosted Trees in plain language.
  • Use interpretable models (e.g., Decision Trees) as surrogates for black-box models when necessary.

For example, SHAP values can demonstrate how individual features like “vehicle age” or “claim history” contributed to a risk score. This transparency is crucial for building trust with stakeholders and complying with regulatory standards.

Advanced Techniques in Insurance

To lead the way in ML innovation, explore cutting-edge approaches:

  • Graph Neural Networks (GNNs): Model relationships between agents, claims, and policyholders to uncover fraud.
  • Transfer Learning: Fine-tune pre-trained models for NLP tasks like analyzing claim descriptions.
  • Causal Inference: Separate correlation from causation for pricing and risk analysis.

Advanced techniques such as GNNs provide a powerful way to model complex interactions, such as the relationship between multiple policyholders involved in suspicious claim patterns. Similarly, transfer learning accelerates the deployment of NLP models to process vast amounts of unstructured claim text efficiently.

Real-World Deployment

Deploying ML models in production requires attention to scalability and reliability:

  • Automation: Use MLflow or Kubeflow to automate training and deployment pipelines.
  • Monitoring: Detect model drift over time using A/B testing.
  • Scalability: Containerize applications with Docker and deploy on cloud platforms like AWS Sagemaker.

A well-architected deployment pipeline ensures that models remain robust and effective as new data flows in. For instance, regularly retraining fraud detection models on fresh claims data can prevent performance degradation caused by shifting fraud patterns.

Ethical Considerations in ML

While ML offers transformative potential, it also raises ethical concerns that must be addressed proactively:

  • Bias Mitigation: Ensure models do not inadvertently discriminate against specific groups by analyzing disparate impact and auditing feature selection.
  • Data Privacy: Protect customer data by adhering to GDPR, CCPA, and similar regulations.
  • Transparent Communication: Clearly explain ML-driven decisions to stakeholders and customers.

By embedding ethics into your ML workflows, you can build trust with customers and regulators while avoiding reputational risks.

Conclusion: Driving Innovation with ML in Insurance

Machine Learning offers unparalleled opportunities to transform the insurance industry—from optimizing risk assessment and pricing to improving customer retention and detecting fraud. As a CTO, mastering the intricacies of ML algorithms and their implementation not only drives business growth but also positions your organization as a leader in this data-driven era.

By combining technical expertise with a strategic vision, you can unlock the full potential of ML to innovate and stay ahead in the competitive insurance landscape.

Whether you’re building customer segmentation models, deploying fraud detection systems, or exploring advanced techniques like Graph Neural Networks, the future of insurance will be defined by those who leverage ML effectively. The key is to focus on solving real problems, aligning technology with business goals, and maintaining a commitment to ethical, transparent practices.

Bridging Sales and Engineering: Unlocking Spectacular Results in Product Companies

The Challenge: Misaligned Teams, Missed Opportunities

Imagine this scenario: A high-growth software company is gaining traction, and the sales team is aggressively bringing in deals. But cracks begin to appear. Engineers feel blindsided by unrealistic deadlines and unfeasible promises. Sales, on the other hand, is frustrated by the lack of feature delivery and delayed timelines. Customers are left unsatisfied, churn increases, and growth begins to stall.

This disconnect is more common than it should be, and it costs companies millions in lost revenue and trust. As a CTO, I’ve seen this friction play out, but I’ve also witnessed the incredible power that a harmonious sales-engineering collaboration can bring. The key is to intentionally align the two teams to operate as a cohesive unit that prioritizes the customer above all.

Here’s how.

1. Create a Shared Understanding of the Customer

Problem: Engineers often work in isolation from customers, relying on secondhand insights from sales. This leads to features that don’t solve real problems.
Solution: Build mechanisms for engineers to interact directly with customers.
Example: At a previous company, we initiated a “Customer Connect” program where engineers joined sales calls and post-sale onboarding sessions. Hearing customers describe their pain points firsthand fostered empathy and gave engineers context to prioritize impactful solutions.

2. Use Data to Speak the Same Language

Problem: Sales and engineering often prioritize different metrics—sales targets vs. system scalability. This creates misalignment on what “success” looks like.
Solution: Establish shared KPIs that bridge the gap.
Example: In one company, we introduced metrics like feature adoption rate and time-to-value. These KPIs incentivized both teams to focus on delivering products that customers loved and adopted quickly, ensuring alignment from ideation to implementation.

3. Introduce a Transparent Roadmap Process

Problem: Sales often feels left out of roadmap planning, while engineering struggles to accommodate ad hoc requests.
Solution: Build a collaborative roadmap planning process.
Example: At one of my previous companies, we held quarterly roadmap workshops where sales pitched top customer asks, prioritized by revenue impact and market fit. Engineering evaluated feasibility, and together, we defined a realistic delivery timeline. This process gave both teams visibility and ownership over the roadmap.

4. Empower Cross-Functional SWAT Teams

Problem: When issues arise, the blame game often starts—sales blames engineering for bugs, while engineering blames sales for overselling.
Solution: Form cross-functional teams to tackle high-stakes challenges together.
Example: When an enterprise customer threatened to churn due to a critical feature gap, we deployed a SWAT team comprising sales, engineering, and customer success. By working together, we delivered a tailored solution in record time, turning a potential loss into a glowing testimonial.

5. Foster a Culture of Mutual Respect

Problem: Engineers may view sales as overly aggressive, while sales may see engineers as overly rigid.
Solution: Break silos by building empathy.
Example: At a company offsite, we ran a role-switching exercise where engineers tried to “sell” our product and sales teams participated in debugging challenges. This exercise broke down stereotypes and created a newfound respect for each other’s skills and challenges.

6. Leverage Technology to Close Gaps

Problem: Miscommunication often arises due to a lack of shared tools or processes.
Solution: Invest in integrated tools that foster collaboration.
Example: By using platforms like Salesforce integrated with Jira, we enabled sales to log customer requests directly into engineering’s backlog, complete with revenue impact and urgency. This automation reduced miscommunication and ensured customer needs were appropriately prioritized.

7. Celebrate Wins as a Team

Problem: Sales often gets the glory for closing deals, while engineering’s contributions go unrecognized.
Solution: Celebrate customer wins together.
Example: When a major deal closed, our CEO made it a point to highlight the engineering team’s role in delivering the features that clinched the sale. This fostered pride and a sense of shared achievement.

Why This Matters

Companies with aligned sales and engineering teams have a superpower—they can move faster, deliver more value, and retain customers longer. This synergy fuels sustainable growth and creates a competitive edge in crowded markets.

Call to Action

If you’re a CEO, founder, or board member, ask yourself:

  • Are your sales and engineering teams working as one, or are they pulling in different directions?
  • Have you created systems to align priorities, build empathy, and ensure both teams focus on delivering customer value?

Investing in collaboration between sales and engineering isn’t just a nice-to-have—it’s essential for scaling your business and delighting customers. It’s the difference between a product that stagnates and one that dominates its market.

Let’s build bridges, not silos. Spectacular results are waiting.

What do you think of this framework? Would you add any examples from your own experiences?

What Mountains Teach Us About Building Businesses: Lessons from Mammoth

In the past few days, I had the privilege of visiting the majestic Mammoth Mountain, and it was nothing short of awe-inspiring. The snow-covered peaks stretched endlessly into the sky, offering a humbling reminder of nature’s grandeur and resilience. As I soaked in the breathtaking scenery and engaged in exhilarating activities, I couldn’t help but reflect on the profound lessons these mountains hold for us as business leaders.

Here are five key lessons that Mammoth’s towering presence teaches us about building and leading businesses.

1. Think Big: The Sky is the Limit

Standing before the Mammoth Mountains, you can’t help but feel inspired by their immensity. They remind us that there’s no limit to what we can achieve if we allow ourselves to dream big.

In business, thinking big isn’t just a mindset—it’s a mandate. Whether you’re setting ambitious goals for your team, creating a transformative product, or redefining your market, aim for the summit. Ask yourself: What impact do I want to make, not just today, but for the future? Don’t settle for incremental changes when exponential growth is within reach.

Call to Action: Write down your moonshot goals. Share them with your team and start working toward the vision that feels as audacious as scaling a mountain.

2. Take Small Steps: Progress Over Perfection

Climbing a mountain isn’t done in one giant leap. It’s a series of small, deliberate steps that bring you closer to the peak.

The same is true in business. Every milestone—no matter how small—is progress. By breaking down big goals into actionable steps, you create a path to success. On the flip side, trying to take massive leaps without preparation can result in setbacks, eroding confidence and momentum.

As leaders, it’s our responsibility to set a steady pace, celebrate progress, and maintain focus. Remember: each step forward is a victory in itself.

Call to Action: Identify the “next best step” for your business and commit to taking it today.

3. Stand Tall: Resilience is Non-Negotiable

Mountains stand tall through seasons of change—summer heat, autumn winds, and harsh winter snowstorms. They remind us of the importance of resilience.

Businesses, like mountains, face their share of challenges: economic downturns, shifting market demands, or team setbacks. Success doesn’t come from avoiding challenges; it comes from weathering them with courage and adaptability. Resilience means staying grounded in your values while remaining flexible enough to adapt to changing circumstances.

Call to Action: Reflect on a recent challenge your business faced. How did you stand tall? What lessons can you apply to future obstacles?

4. Build a Fun Environment: Joy Fuels Success

The Mammoth Mountain village is a hub of energy and excitement. Whether it’s enjoying gourmet meals, exploring charming shops, or engaging in outdoor adventures, it’s clear that joy is part of the experience.

The same should hold true in our businesses. Building a company is hard work, but that doesn’t mean it can’t also be joyful. When your team feels a sense of excitement and camaraderie, they’re more engaged, creative, and productive. A workplace culture infused with fun and celebration becomes the foundation for long-term success.

Call to Action: Plan a team-building activity or find ways to inject fun into your daily operations. Even small gestures, like surprise celebrations or creative challenges, can make a big impact.

5. Create an Ecosystem: The Power of Collaboration

One of the most striking aspects of Mammoth is the vibrant ecosystem surrounding it. Restaurants, ski lodges, outdoor gear shops, and local artisans all contribute to a thriving community. This ecosystem supports the mountain’s allure and creates value for everyone involved.

In business, growth is magnified when we think beyond ourselves and build ecosystems. Partnerships, industry alliances, and thriving customer communities amplify impact. No business achieves its true potential in isolation. By fostering an interconnected network, you contribute to a bigger vision and share success with others.

Call to Action: Identify opportunities to collaborate with other businesses or create value for a larger community. How can your business be a hub of innovation and connection?

Closing Thoughts: Reach for the Summit

The Mammoth Mountains remind us that greatness lies in thinking big, taking purposeful steps, and standing resilient through life’s storms. They encourage us to find joy in the journey and to grow not just as individuals but as a community.

As business leaders, the challenge isn’t just to climb higher but to leave a legacy—just as the mountains have done for centuries. So, look to the peaks for inspiration, and let their timeless wisdom guide your path.

Your Next Step: What lesson from the mountains will you apply to your business today? Share your thoughts with your team, and let the conversation spark new ideas for growth and success.

The Mammoth Mountains are a testament to what’s possible when we embrace scale, strength, and community. Let’s lead with those values in mind and build businesses as majestic and enduring as these incredible peaks.

Realizing success with team accountability

Accountability is one of the key pillars that brings success to any team. Let’s delve a bit into it.

Here’s a simple definition of accountability. It is the cornerstone of a successful team, representing the commitment of individuals to take responsibility for their actions and outcomes. It goes beyond mere task completion; it’s about owning the results and acknowledging the impact of one’s contributions on the team’s overall success.

Accountability is important for a number of reasons. It can help to:

Improve performance. When people are accountable, they are more likely to be motivated and focused on achieving their goals.
Build trust. When people know that they can rely on each other to be accountable, it builds trust and creates a more positive and productive work environment.
Create a culture of excellence. When accountability is valued and rewarded, it creates a culture where everyone is striving to do their best.
Reduce risk. When people are accountable for their actions, it helps to reduce the risk of errors and mistakes.
Promote fairness and equity. When everyone is held to the same standards, it promotes fairness and equity in the workplace.

Hence, it is necessary to have a culture of accountability where everyone registers the concept. Each of us need to ourselves accountable before holding others accountable. How can we hold ourselves accountable? Here are a few ways to do it.

Set clear goals and expectations. What do you want to achieve? What are the specific steps you need to take to get there? Once you have a clear understanding of your goals and expectations, you can start to develop a plan for how to achieve them.
Break down your goals into smaller tasks. This will make them seem less daunting and more achievable.
Set deadlines for each task. This will help you stay on track and make sure that you are making progress.
Find an accountability partner. This could be a friend, colleague, family member, or coach. Having someone to check in with regularly can help you stay motivated and accountable.
Reward yourself for completing tasks and reaching milestones. This will help you stay positive and motivated.
Be honest with yourself about your progress. Don’t try to sugarcoat things or make excuses. If you’re falling behind, identify the reasons why and make a plan to get back on track.
Celebrate your successes. It’s important to recognize your accomplishments, no matter how small they may seem. This will help you stay motivated and keep moving forward.
Don’t be afraid to ask for help. If you’re struggling to achieve your goals, don’t be afraid to ask for help from your accountability partner, a mentor, or another trusted advisor.

And then, as a leader, we need to hold the team accountable. Here’s a stab at how we can do that.

Set clear goals and expectations. Make sure that everyone on your team understands what they are responsible for and what is expected of them. This includes setting specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound goals.
Provide regular feedback. Don’t wait until the end of a project to give your team feedback. Provide regular feedback, both positive and negative, so that your team members know how they are doing and where they can improve.
Measure progress. Track your team’s progress towards their goals and deadlines. This will help you to identify any potential problems early on and take corrective action as needed.
Be willing to give tough love. If a team member is not meeting expectations, you need to be willing to address the issue directly. This may involve giving them a negative performance review, putting them on probation, or even firing them.
Celebrate successes. When your team achieves a goal, be sure to celebrate their success. This will help to boost morale and motivate them to continue to perform at a high level.

Evolve the architecture, keep it beautiful!

Earlier in the week, I had a Neal treat at the City by the Bay, the beautiful San Francisco. Neal Ford, a long-time Thoughtworks leader was scheduled to do a session on Evolutionary Architecture. I have always been fascinated by what Neal had to say. Be it Functional programming, Technology Radar, or Architecture skills amongst the many topics he has spoken on, Neal brings a unique and interesting perspective. Evolutionary Architecture has been on my radar for a while to explore. It touches upon a compelling topic of how do you enforce your architecture so there is sanity in the code. The session at Thoughtworks gave me an opportunity to spend some time on the topic.

So, what is Evolutionary Architecture? As with any subject, we’d first need a definition to begin exploring. Neal defines it as follows.

An evolutionary architecture supports incremental, guided change as a first principle across multiple dimensions.

The three key aspects here are ‘incremental’, ‘guided change’, and ‘multiple dimensions’. If you have been into building non-trivial applications, you would know that features are released in increments. Each of these features would have to adhere to certain architectural traits. Typically, in organizations, there are architectural guidelines for teams to follow and build applications in accordance with the guidelines. Although the teams are sincere in their intent to align with the architecture, there are times when things go sideways. How would you enforce the rules? On top of that, there are several dimensions across which the architecture needs to be adhered to. There are a whole host of ‘ilities’ that you need to keep in mind. Wikipedia list a bunch of them here .

Let us dissect the concepts into pieces that we can use to define the architecture. Per Neal, these building blocks are Fitness Functions. These functions help us identify how we close or far are the solutions to the intended design. Here is the definition from the book.

a particular type of objective function that is used to summarize…how close a given design solution is to achieving the set aims.

Fitness functions can be viewed across various dimensions – atomic, holistic, batch, continuous. An atomic function would surround say a transaction. With holistic, you would want to cover a swathe of the application. Batch and continuous are self explanatory.

To aid writing fitness function, we have ArchUnit library. You can check out the library here . With archunit, you can codify the rules that capture your architecture. These tests can then be run within the pipeline. Any violation is stopped in its tracks. For instance, you can set a rule that the developer cannot call third party libraries directly. Or it could be that *Dao classes cannot be in a certain package. An example from archunit’s github codebase is presented below.

@Test
public void DAOs_must_reside_in_a_dao_package() {
classes().that().haveNameMatching(“.*Dao”).should().resideInAPackage(“..dao..”).as(“DAOs should reside in a package ‘..dao..'”).check(classes);

}

So, how do you actually bring the recommendations to fruition? Fitness Function Katas are here to our rescue. As Neal mentioned ‘Architecture Katas’, I felt nostalgic about Pragmatic Dave’s Code Katas that I had practiced back in the day. Architecture Katas have been a brain child of Ted Neward. For evolutionary architectures, the fitness function katas are listed on the companion book site. There are quite a few katas that you can try out. Guidelines on how to run the katas are also explained.

As I wrap up my narrative, here is what I suggest you do. First, check out the website http://evolutionaryarchitecture.com/ to start the journey. Second, get the book from here . Finally and most importantly, read and implement the Fitness Function Katas listed on the site and in the book.

Feel to leave comments below. I’d love know what you have to say.